Hi CheapSk8,
I would certainly consider them because to me the quality of the materials in a mattress is more important (and a much more reliable indocator of the durability of a mattress) than a warranty. Genuine factory defects (which is what the warranty covers) tend to show up early in the life of a mattress but the biggest reason people need to replace a mattress … the loss of comfort and support that comes from the softening and breakdown of the materials … is not covered by a warranty. You would still have the warranty anyway but it may be more difficult to deal with any warranty issues because you would be dealing directly with the manufacturer rather than a local retailer. It’s really a matter of the tradeoffs involved but I would personally give it serious consideration yes. You can read more or my thoughts about warranties in post #174 here.
Generally you would be dealing with the retailer who sold you the mattress who would be the intermediary between you and the manufacturer but in this case you would be dealing directly with the manufacturer. In some cases they may suggest another local dealer who can help with warranty issues or replacement.
This could be “worth it” if the mattress matches your needs and preferences and price is a good but secondary benefit. You would also need to add a suitable foundation but this shouldn’t be an issue. The Contour uses good quality materials so if it’s “perfect” for you then it would be good value (and excessive price rather than low quality is the main issue with most Tempurpedic mattresses). If a mattress isn’t suitable for you though in terms of PPP (Pressure relief, posture and alignment, and Personal preferences) and doesn’t provide the quality of sleep you need … then no price is worth it. If it “fits” … then it would be a tradeoff (price vs warranty) that would be worth considering IMO. I would just be careful not to let any influence of “wanting to like it” affect your testing.
I’m looking forward to your feedback.
Phoenix